Sacred sites where the body parts of Goddess Sati fell. • 49 sites
51 baseline with variant traditions
This collection follows PujaKit authority metadata for the normalized Shakti Peetha baseline. Some records preserve regional or text-specific variants where traditions differ.
Source review: Maharashtra/Kolhapur tourism sources support the living Mahalakshmi/Ambabai Shakti Peeth identity. The Maha route can use the stotra-backed Mahalakshmi mapping, while strict 51-list body-part and Bhairava claims remain source-review-only. Official/trust/government source linked for living temple or place context; body-part, Shakti-name, Bhairava-name, and disputed-list claims still follow record-level confidence and page-decision notes. Source-review caveat: Needs official/traditional source citation Source-review caveat: Needs alternate-claim review before public page copy Source-review note (2026-05-31): Keep this record source-review-only until the body-part, Shakti-name, Bhairava-name, and location claims are reconciled against reliable official, trust, or traditional-list evidence.
Curated source
Curated source
Curated source
Curated source
Curated source
Curated source
Curated source
Curated source
Curated source
Curated source
Source review: Baseline has enough confidence for a carefully sourced page or internal link, subject to final page-level source citation. Official/place-context source reviewed in this pass; no stable official, district, trust, or tourism source was recorded for this exact Peeth identity. Keep public copy caveated and rely on traditional/source-variance notes until a stronger source is found. Source-review caveat: Official place-context unavailable in this pass; keep traditional claim cautious.
Curated source
Curated source
Curated source
Source review: Baseline has enough confidence for a carefully sourced page or internal link, subject to final page-level source citation. Official/place-context source reviewed in this pass; no stable official, district, trust, or tourism source was recorded for this exact Peeth identity. Keep public copy caveated and rely on traditional/source-variance notes until a stronger source is found. Source-review caveat: Official place-context unavailable in this pass; keep traditional claim cautious.
Curated source
Source review: Baseline has enough confidence for a carefully sourced page or internal link, subject to final page-level source citation. Official/government place-context source linked for the living temple or pilgrimage context; Peeth body-part and deity-name claims still follow source_variance and confidence notes.
Curated source
Curated source
Curated source
Source review: Keep as source-review-only until disputed body part, Shakti/Bhairava names, and location claims are reconciled.
Curated source
Curated source
Source review: Baseline has enough confidence for a carefully sourced page or internal link, subject to final page-level source citation. Official/place-context source reviewed in this pass; no stable official, district, trust, or tourism source was recorded for this exact Peeth identity. Keep public copy caveated and rely on traditional/source-variance notes until a stronger source is found. Source-review caveat: Official place-context unavailable in this pass; keep traditional claim cautious.
Curated source
Source review: Baseline has enough confidence for a carefully sourced page or internal link, subject to final page-level source citation. Official/place-context source reviewed in this pass; no stable official, district, trust, or tourism source was recorded for this exact Peeth identity. Keep public copy caveated and rely on traditional/source-variance notes until a stronger source is found. Source-review caveat: Official place-context unavailable in this pass; keep traditional claim cautious.
Curated source
Source review: Baseline has enough confidence for a carefully sourced page or internal link, subject to final page-level source citation. Official/place-context source reviewed in this pass; no stable official, district, trust, or tourism source was recorded for this exact Peeth identity. Keep public copy caveated and rely on traditional/source-variance notes until a stronger source is found. Source-review caveat: Official place-context unavailable in this pass; keep traditional claim cautious.
Curated source
Source review: Baseline has enough confidence for a carefully sourced page or internal link, subject to final page-level source citation. Official/place-context source reviewed in this pass; no stable official, district, trust, or tourism source was recorded for this exact Peeth identity. Keep public copy caveated and rely on traditional/source-variance notes until a stronger source is found. Source-review caveat: Official place-context unavailable in this pass; keep traditional claim cautious.
Curated source
Source review: Baseline can remain routeable and the Maha route can be publishable with caveats because traditional sources support Kashmir/Saraswati and heritage sources support Sharada tradition; original-site access, modern geography, body-part, and Bhairava claims remain sensitive and variant-prone. Heritage source supports Sharada tradition and Teetwal revival context, and traditional 18-name references support Kashmir/Saraswati, but neither settles original Peeth access, Bhairava, or body-part claims. Source-review caveat: Keep modern geography and access wording careful.
Curated source
Affiliated source
Curated source
Source review: Keep as source-review-only until disputed body part, Shakti/Bhairava names, and location claims are reconciled. Official/trust/government source linked for living temple or place context; body-part, Shakti-name, Bhairava-name, and disputed-list claims still follow record-level confidence and page-decision notes. Source-review caveat: Needs official/traditional source citation Source-review caveat: Needs alternate-claim review before public page copy Source-review note (2026-05-31): Keep this record source-review-only until the body-part, Shakti-name, Bhairava-name, and location claims are reconciled against reliable official, trust, or traditional-list evidence.
Curated source
Curated source
Source review: Baseline has enough confidence for a carefully sourced page or internal link, subject to final page-level source citation. Official/place-context source reviewed in this pass; no stable official, district, trust, or tourism source was recorded for this exact Peeth identity. Keep public copy caveated and rely on traditional/source-variance notes until a stronger source is found. Source-review caveat: Official place-context unavailable in this pass; keep traditional claim cautious.
